Friday, October 18, 2024

Wolf Hall ~ Hilary Mantel

 


'Wolf Hall', our BOTM for November, which is a larger book in size and scale, we had set of milestones, using which we can gauge our reading progress. 


Part 1- 19/10


Part 2 & 3 - 26/10


Part 4 & 5 - 2/11


Part 6 - 9/11






Set in the period from 1500 to 1535, Wolf Hall is a sympathetic fictionalised biography documenting the rapid rise to power of Thomas Cromwell in the court of Henry VIII through to the death of Sir Thomas More. The novel won both the Booker Prize and the National Book Critics Circle Award.

As much as I love Tudor history and have read a lot of historical fiction, this book requires strict attention to detail or you keep going backwards to try and understand what is going and who is saying what. ROB It can be a difficult read. Having a reasonable working knowledge of Tudor history does help.

The Tudor period occurred between 1485 and 1603, including the Elizabethan era during the reign of Elizabeth I (1558–1603).


Why were the Tudors called “the Tudors”? Because it was their name. The House of Tudor were descended from the Welsh Tudor family of Penmynydd in Anglesey in North Wales. The Welsh Tudors included Owain Glyndŵr, who was presented as a rather comic figure in Shakespeare's Henry IV Part 1, Owen Glendower.

In 1500, the teenage Thomas Cromwell ran away from home to flee his abusive father and sought his fortune as a soldier in France.

By 1527, the well-travelled Cromwell had returned to England and was now a lawyer, a married father of three, and highly respected as the right-hand man of Cardinal Thomas Wolsey, with a reputation for successful deal-making. His life takes a tragic turn when his wife and two daughters abruptly die of the sweating sickness, leaving him a widower. His sister-in-law, Johane, comes to keep house for him.

Cromwell is still in Wolsey's service in 1529 when the Cardinal falls out of favour with King Henry VIII because he failed to arrange an annulment of the King's marriage to Catherine of Aragon. Cromwell manages to buy the Cardinal a little time before everything the Cardinal owns is repossessed and given to Henry's mistress, Anne Boleyn. Cromwell subsequently decides to relocate the Cardinal and his entourage to a second home in Esher, and the Cardinal moves on to York.

Though he knows the Cardinal is doomed, Cromwell begins negotiations on his behalf with the King. During his visits, he meets the recently widowed Mary Boleyn, Anne's elder sister, and is intrigued by her. Cromwell is eventually summoned to meet Anne and finds Henry's loyalty to her unfathomable.

Continuing to gain favour with both the King and Anne, Cromwell is disturbed by Wolsey's activities in York but is shocked when he learns that the Cardinal has been recalled to London to face treason charges and has died on the way. Cromwell mourns his death and vows to take vengeance on those involved in his downfall. Despite his known loyalty to Wolsey, Cromwell retains his favoured status with the King and is sworn into the King's council after interpreting one of Henry's nightmares about his deceased elder brother as a symbol that Henry should govern with the blessing of his late father and brother.

Cromwell continues to advise Anne and works towards her ascent to Queen, hoping he will rise too. Just as the wedding appears imminent, Henry Percy, a former lover of Anne's, declares that he is her legal husband and still loves her. Cromwell visits Percy on Anne's behalf and threatens him into silence, securing his position as a favourite in the Howard household.

King Henry travels to France for a successful conference with the French. Finally, secure in her position, Anne can marry Henry privately and consummate their relationship. She quickly becomes pregnant, and Henry has her crowned Queen in a ceremony that Cromwell perfectly organises.

Thursday, October 17, 2024

Happy Hormones and Healthy You

Prioritise Mental Health at work is the theme for this month. 

Neha Dey counselling Psychologist, from Silver Oak, gave us an amazing session on Happy Hormones and Healthy You.

Befriend neurotransmitters for enhanced mental wellbeing ~ Happy Hormones. 

How can we induce or enhance this?

Practice in our day to day life:

Compliment Chain

We feel loved and belonged. 

Why wait, let us do it right here and right now. 

Compliment in group and criticise in private. 

When you add friend to colleagues, it will destress mental health. 

Compliment help release Oxytocin.


  1. Educate: Understand the practice and why it is needed. 
  2. Neurotransmitters : They are messengers of our brain. Acts as a booster. 
  3. D.O.S.E
    1. Dopomine - Reward or pleasure harmon - when you feel when drunk
    2. Oxytocin - Love
    3. Serotonin - Mood stabiliser, help manager stress. 
    4. Endorphin - Natural pain reliver

Mindful Object Focus Activity. 

Take an item and hold in a hand. - Keep in a one hand distance - It is a practice of focusing on the present, the object and not go to future or past. 

Stress come from past and future thought, the mindful object exercise help release, Serotonin

DESKERCISE

Have auditory focus. 

Exercise help release Endorphin

ENCOURAGE

Make a done list. 

Dopomine release. 

Excessive amount of harmone release can effect your overall well being. In the long run, it is not a healthy practice. 



Auron Mein Kahan Dum Tha


 

One can feel the strongness of emotions throughout the movie. Mature love stories are generally rare in Indian cinema, which adds a sense of novelty to this film. The film beautifully defines how a relationship should be, showcasing trust, understanding, and emotional growth. The entire cast delivers superb performances, bringing depth and authenticity to their characters. While some viewers may complain about the movie’s slow pace, this allows for a richer exploration of its themes.

Directed by Neeraj Pandey of  whose directorial debute A Wednesday was a block buster, the film Auron Mein Kahan Dum Tha  follows a couple whose love story spans 23 years from 2000 to 2023, delving into the emotional depth and evolving dynamics of their relationship over two decades. Krishna gets involved in multiple murders - or does he really, why and how - to know this, you have to watch the movie. He  is sentenced to life imprisonment. This leads to Vasudha getting separated from him and marrying Abhijeet. After 22 years when Krishna is released from prison  getting pardon, he yearns to meet Vasudha but do not want to. It culminates in one final meeting between Krishna and Vasudha. What happens then is also interesting.

Jimmy Sheirgill as Abhijeet, Vasudha's husband have enacted his insecurities very well. Ajay Devgn as Krishna, Shantanu Maheshwari as young Krishna and Tabu as Vasudha and Saiee Manjrekar as young Vasudha undoubtedly has good chemistry and well played. 

Although the term literally translates as "Where Was the Courage in Others", it does not reflect the true sense of the phrase. Thought well made, the film bombed at the box office. Made with a budget of 100 crore, it could collect around 12.5 crores. 


I Came Upon a Lighthouse ~ Shantanu Naidu (109 of 2024)



The book, published in 2021 by Harper Collins, is a short memoir of life with Ratan Tata' as claimed by the writer Shantanu Naidu, the trusted assistant of Mr. Tata, who had a much closer personal relationship with him. He warns his readers that the book is a result more of heart and story and less of artistic capability.' The book has brilliant artwork by Sanjan Desai, which captures the tone of the content effectively. The book is an illustrated memoir of Naidu's candid interaction with Tata over five years. 

It starts with a note by Ratan Tata himself, which briefly tells the reader how he met Shantanu and how their association developed. One could say that the remainder of the book is a detailed expansion of this note in a deeper and more personal tone. It begins with how the author, who comes from a family in which the members worked with Tatas for generations, met Ratan Tata for the first time when he decided to create a start-up that helped street dogs. Tata, who also loved animals, was impressed with the idea and invested in it. Thus began a companionship that continued through his education in an Ivy League college and his career as the Deputy General Manager in Ratan Tata's office. 

Chapters in the book are:



Santanus Great Grandfather worked for Tata Power, Grandfather for Tata Electrical, Father  for Tata Motors, cousin for Tata Consultancy and Santanu for Tata Elxsi.

The book doesn't offer much insight into the personal or professional life of Ratan Tata. It do mention about his house name being 'Halekai' Hawaiian for 'house by the sea'. The book he liked is 'The Art of Racing in the Rain '


Entire slums are run by slum lords who are impossible to trump. Both graduated from Cornwell one in 1958 and the other in 2017

After college, when he started supporting in the Trust work, his job included travelling with Tata, wherever he went. During one such travel he visited  Pere Lachaise cemetery, Division 89, Line 1, first Tome - Grave of JRD Tata, engraved with Parsi Phrase - Humata Huxta Huvarshta - Good thought, good word, good act. Tiny strong guardians of light house were Deepthi, Parizaad and Denese.

 It focuses more on the core memories that the writer retains from his interactions. It is about the parental figure that took him in his wings and helped him soar high in his path. It's about a friend with whom he could share everything about his life. It's about the tough mentor who ensured that the writer was imbued with all the qualities that made him a perfect person. It's a featherlight book that is about how Ratan Tata impacted the life of its author. 

Ratan Tata did not have to try, empathy and sensitivity came naturally to him. 


Millennial Dumbledore! ~ That is how he described him to HOB

 ‘We don’t sell broken businesses; we fix them.’ - Ratan Tata. 

"I told him that when I write a book, I would write about another side of him and not just historic events or business milestones."

Every business leader maintains a public image that is consciously built up through PR companies. That's why you find their public personas consistently extremely flamboyant, nerdy, conservative, or intellectual. In the case of Ratan Tata, I felt his constructed one was that of a benevolent, philanthropist figure whose purse strings are forever open for the worthy. It's that of a man who could never do an injustice. The book maintains the same facade, which I feel is perfectly fine. But other than this public image, the book also puts forward the portrait of a man who loved to have fun, have a swim, pull the legs, drink aamras, and forever value commitments. That, I feel, is the real service that the book does to the memories of the deceased industrialist.

"I like to capture experiences. But what I love is to share them. It's not a popularity thing. It's a character trait that is so fundamental, that when I experience something beautiful, I want everyone to experience it with me. When I learn a lesson, I want to tell the story. My life is an open book (now quite literally)"


Monday, October 14, 2024

Tata's ~ P.J. Alexander






"JRD: Forgotten Tata Titan"


 As India mourned the demise of Ratan Naval Tata, speculation was rife about who would succeed him as Chairman of Tata Trusts, with some even (wildly?) claiming that his young friend Shantanu Naidu would take over the reins of nonsectarian philanthropic "Sir Dorabji and Sir Ratan Tata Trusts" which had for nearly a century been run by a series of very distinguished Trustees ... Nani Palkiwalla,  John Mathai, Prof Choksi, Sir Homi Mody and Tata family members..  

The Tata Trusts funded the Indian Institute of Science(Bangalore),  Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Tata Memorial Hospital, National Institute for Performing Arts, and Dr MS Swaminathan Research  Foundation(Chenai). The Trusts also supported students across disciplines.(In the late 1940s, my father, Dr J Alexander, was funded for his Physics PhD and KR Narayanan his programme at LSE, London. As a student in the 1960s, I was privileged to receive a scholarship from Sir Dorabji Tata Trust which was then managed by very interactive and supportive Mrs Vesugar and Dinshaw Malegamwala).

What was forgotten in the commotion following Ratan Tata's demise, was the key role that JRD Tata had played in the growth and consolidation of the "Salt to Software Tata conglomerate" from  1931 until he demitted office, 60 years later. Son of founder Jamsetji Tata's Paris-based cousin D R Tata and his French wife, JRD was a French citizen (who even served in the French Army) until he came to India to assist and support Jamsetji's sons Sir Dorab & Sir Ratan, who were both married but childless childless, in running the already vast Tata empire. Most of my generation knew( or at least knew about) JRD.

Lacking heirs, Sir Dorab and Lady Tata, also formally adopted 13 year old Naval from an orphanage. Ratan Tata, who passed away at 86,  and Jimmy ( the billionaire who lives a simple life, largely unconnected with business) are the sons of Naval and his Parsi first wife. Noel their half-brother, was born in 1956 to Naval and his French (second) wife, Simone, who later successfully headed cosmetic firm "Lakme" (a spinoff from Tata Oil Mills) till it was sold to HUL for Rs 200 crores. The proceeds of this sale funded TRENT, which under Simone and hrr UK-educated son Noel, grew steadily with Westside, ZUDIO, Zara, Star Bazaar, Landmark Books ..

Meanwhile, in 1991, JRD Tata nominated Noel's older half brother Ratan as Chairman of the Tata Trusts and Tata Sons which controlled the $160 bn Tata empire through shareholding. Ratan had to overcame a strong challenge from the Tata satraps .. Russi Mody (TISCO), Ajit Kerkar (Taj Hotels) Darbari Seth( Tata Chemicals), FC Kohli (TCS).. before he could effectively take control of Tata Sons, the group's holding company. He was innovative and bold and even  ventured abroad through TISCO and Tata Motors/JLR. His Indica car  was a hit with taxi drivers  but his brainchild Nano, was targeted for exceeding the projected Rs 1 lakh cost and its lack of frills. (But Jaya who owned a Nano for a decade,  found it perfect for city driving and ... parking).

Though still hale and hearty, Ratan Tata relinquished Chairmanship of Tata Sons in 2012, on attaining the age of 75, but continued as Chairman of Tata Trusts which controlled Tata Sons through 66% shareholding. His choice for heading Tata Sons was Cyrus Mistry, UK -educated scion of the uber rich Shapoorji Pallonji family which owned 18% of Tata Sons. Sadly, Cyrus and Ratan soon disagreed on several matters, including whether to continue with production and sale of the Nano car,  ... interestingly we saw many Nanos plying  in Srilanka in 2011. Matters got really complicated, not only because of the complex shareholding pattern of Tata Sons, but even more because the two were related in multiple ways, including Cyrus' sister Aloo being  married to Ratan's half brother (and obvious heir?) Noel. After a lengthy legal battle,  Cyrus' ouster from Tata Sons was deemed illegal by NCLAT, but this decision was finally overturned in the Supreme Court. Sadly, Cyrus was killed in a horrendous car crash in 2022, while he and cousins/friends were returning to Mumbai from a visit to the iconic 12 centuries old Udwada Fire Temple, set up when the Zoroastrian Parsis first came to India as refugees from Persia( Iran). 

(The community prospered and contributed immensely to their adopted country:. 

Dadabhai Naoroji & Phirozesha Mehta were leaders in our Freedom Movement;

Tatas, Wadias, Godrej, Petit, were prominent in business and philanthropy;

Polly Umrigar, Nari Contractor, Farouk Engineers played Test Cricket for India;

Zubin Mehta, Freddie Mercury were stars in the Music field;

Homi Bhabha led India's progress in Atomic Energy;

Education was also a chosen area for the Parsis.

The list is long.

 Though Parsi numbers have dwindled, those who are still in India continue to make a massive contribution.)

TCS' competent CEO, N Chandrasekaran, was handpicked by Ratan as Chairman of Tata Sons but the latest development, that is the ascension of Noel Tata as Chairman of Tata Trusts, changes everything by conferring him with direct control of 66% Tata Sons shares  ... plus 18% indirectly, through his wife Aloo Mistry's family! Will he allow Chandrasekaran to continue to be Chairman of Tata Sons and control all the Tata group companies? Though similar in many ways, 67 year old UK- educated Noel is considered more cautious than the late (US-educated) Ratan Tata, who often took very bold "out of the box" decisions ( considered  rash by his detractors).

Noel is also fortunate in having 3 grownup children ( Leah, Maya, Neville) to help and eventually succeed him.

  All power to him! The success of the House of Tata will positively help India to rise in every field ... and you  can be sure that they will give back to us much more than they take. Unlike some other uber "nouveau riche" groups?


J P Alexander


I heard the story of Blending with Milk and Sugar , Parsis with Indian culture, when they left Iran ,The Indian king 


Cyrus Mistry was supposed to continue as the chairman until 2037.Before the can of worms could come out, he was shunted as the chairman.


Ratan didn't want to designate his step brother Noel to succeed him as Chairman of Tata Trusts. Especially after the nasty imbroglia with Cyrus Mistry, who was Noel's wife's brother.

I have interacted with JRD and Tata Trustees of the 1960s, but haven't met Ratan Tata whose official announcement as heir to JRD was long delayed by the latter.. But JRD who was a perfect gentleman, realised that uncertainty could impact the future of Tatas. And in 1991,at age 87, he finally nominated Ratan eldest son of Naval, based on the principle of primogeniture.

Ratan, when he relinquished the Chairmanship of Tata Sons in 2012, initially gave it to Cyrus Mistry scion of the largest private shareholders and then to N Chandrasekaran CEO of TCS. Fortunately, as per rules, Tata Trusts Chairmanship was not his to give to any outsider,  ... least of all to his young friend Shantanu Naidu. Inevitably, Noel, a Tata family member was the only choice for the Trustees.as Chairnan of the Trusts.

All the ingredients for a plot like Sidney Sheldon's "Bloodline"?Especially after the "accidental" death of Cyrus Mistry, whom brother in law Noel would certainly have put back as Chairman of Tata Sons!


It's interesting that 5 generations of Shantanu's family has worked for Tata's.


I feel that JRD was a much better business leader & decision maker than Ratan Tata.much of his acquisitions like corus,tetly & JLR were done at much higher value & has not given the returns to the group.nano& other brands like Indica has practically no takers now.nexon & ev’s gave some impetus to tata motors but shares have come down below 1000 now as ev’s batteries have to be replaced after 5/6 years for which tatas have no economical solution.Cyrus mistry would have lead tatas to a brighter future had Ratan not intervened.tcs has become the flagship company now& has given me better returns than any other Tata shares.it was JRD& kohli who conceived the idea of TCS 50 years ago& deserves all appreciation. F.C.Kohli was the first chief of TCS


His pushing Cyrus Mistry out according to some was unwarranted.  Yeah, the 48 Laws of Power. You have outlined all his errors here.  As a country we just tend to go overboard as witnessed in this post-RT hagiology.In future, one may see Tata Motors getting merged with Toyota India.

The Vegetarian ~ Han Kang (108 of 2024)

 The Vegetarian by Han Kang is a critically acclaimed novel that delves into themes of identity, societal norms, and the consequences of personal choices. Originally published in 2007 in Korean and later translated into English in 2015, the book has garnered significant attention, winning the 2016 Man Booker International Prize. Hang Kang is particularly hated by male communities online in her home country because of her fearless stance and writing for women. She is in new now because she won Noble last week. 



The translator, Deborah Smith, is loved by the Korean public for her peculiar style of retaining some Korean words as such in transliterated form as they would lose the meaning or cultural context if translated literally.

Other than the issues of patriarchy and sexual repression, The Vegetarian also covers many universal and profound themes, especially individuality, identity and conformance.

The story is set in modern-day Seoul and follows Yeong-hye, a seemingly ordinary woman who decides to stop eating meat after experiencing a disturbing nightmare filled with images of human cruelty. This decision triggers a profound transformation in her life, leading to devastating consequences for herself and those around her. The narrative unfolds through the perspectives of three different characters: Yeong-hye herself, her husband, and her sister, each providing unique insights into her psychological state and the impact of her choices on their lives.

We follow a woman named Yeong-hye, who decides to stop eating meat after having horrible dreams. This decision of hers starts a trajectory of events that fragment everybody's life around her. The novel has three parts, and each part unfolds from the perspectives of three individuals in her life. 

  • The first part titled 'The Vegetarian' is narrated in first-person by her husband. 
  • The second is titled 'Mongolian Mark' and the story proceeds from the perspective of her sister's husband in the third-person, 
  • while the third, 'Flaming Trees', is a third-person narrative focusing on her sister. 

Even though the level of intimacy and empathy these central characters, from whose eyes we watch the curious case of Yeong-hye, display towards her differs vastly, it is not difficult to infer that the overarching composition of their attitude towards her is undeniably that of control. All these characters, in their ways, try to make decisions for her, judge her, and interfere with her personal freedom. While her husband and her immediate family, especially her violent father, are largely trying to make her bound to the gender roles that are promulgated by society, her sister's husband has an intention that's part carnal and part artistic. But her sister, who also wants her to return to normalcy, also realizes that it could even be herself in her place if the circumstances were different. 

The novel begins by questioning the control that society exerts in a person's life and refuses to acknowledge the root causes of such decisions. From the beginning, it is pronounced that turning to vegetarianism is the reason for Yeong-hye's behavior, while no one bothers to find out the real issues that are far deeper and rooted. Her husband or her parents are not aware of it and don't even bother to find it out, even when they stare at their faces. 

Han Kang's writing is noted for its lyrical prose and intense imagery, exploring the boundaries of the human experience and the struggle for autonomy in a conformist society. The novel raises disturbing questions about the nature of existence, the body, and the societal pressures that dictate personal choices. It is both a sensual and provocative exploration of the human condition, making it a powerful and thought-provoking read.

Overall, The Vegetarian is not just a story about dietary choices; it is a profound commentary on the complexities of life, identity, and the often-painful journey toward self-discovery.

https://amzn.to/481Me7w

You can also get the audio book for FREE using the same link. Use the link to register for the audio book on Audible and start enjoying it.

The Vegetarian by the latest Nobel-winner Han Kang is a complex work that is a melting pot of a variety of important themes about human life. It's devastating, intense and profound, which has the potential to keep its reader entranced for a prolonged period even after putting it down.

Sunday, October 13, 2024

A History of the World in 10 1/2 Chapters ~ Julian Barnes (107 of 2024)

 A History of the World in 10 ½ Chapters (1989), a collection of  subtly connected short historical stories in different styles, most are fictional but some are historical written by Julian Patrick Barnes, tells Earth’s story from biblical times to the 1980s.


Julian Barnes is the author of nine novels, including Metroland, Flaubert's Parrot, A History of the World in 10 ½ Chapters, England, England and Arthur and George, and two collections of short stories, Cross Channel and The Lemon Table.

Winner of the Man Booker Prize for Fiction 2011Beginning with an unlikely stowaway's account of life on board Noah's Ark, A History of the World in 101/2 Chapters presents a surprising and subversive fictional-history of earth told from several kaleidoscopic perspectives.

Although the stories within the collection stand alone, they are all linked through their connection to Noah’s Ark and the woodworms that boarded the Ark as stowaways. The woodworms, who claim to know exactly what happened aboard Noah’s Ark, reappear at various points throughout the book. They serve as a metaphor for decay and how our appreciation and understanding of history worsens over time. Too often, we forget history and what it can teach us, and the truth is lost forever.



The first story, “The Stowaway,” centers on the woodworms’ journey on Noah’s Ark. They lament that God and Noah chose to abandon them, leaving them to go extinct. Now that they are on the ship, they comment on how what they see is very different from typical modern accounts of Noah’s Ark. It reminds them of a prison cell, not paradise, and they question whether Noah was the right person for the job. They wish they could hijack the ship and turn it around.



In the second story, “The Visitors,” the narrative jumps forward to 1985; this time, someone does hijack a ship. Terrorists take over a luxury cruise liner and torment everyone on board. A man dies as the event descends into an international crisis. Barnes based the story on the real-life hijacking of MS Achille Lauro in 1985.


“The Wars of Religion” returns to the woodworms, putting them back into the spotlight. This time, they are charged with vandalizing a church by eating its foundations. Because of them, the church is unstable. Here, Barnes draws a connection between forgetting history and the erosion of faith and religion.


In “The Survivor,” Barnes takes readers into an alternate universe. In this universe, Earth’s first major disaster is the Chernobyl tragedy. Hysteria spreads, and everyone thinks nuclear war is imminent. The protagonist in this story is so terrified that she runs as far away from society as she can get. She spends the rest of her life at sea; it is unclear whether nuclear war erupts.


“Shipwreck” focuses on the painting The Raft of Medusa. The narrator doesn’t like the painting very much because it sanitizes a tragic shipwreck. The picture doesn’t show the true horror of a shipwreck—instead, it glamorizes death and suffering for artistic effect.


“The Mountain” includes The Raft of Medusa as a talking point. In this story, a woman who visits a monastery in the mountains views the painting and reflects on its meaning. She then devotes her time to God and apologizing for the sins of others. Specifically, she wants God to forgive her father for whatever crimes he committed in life.


“Three Simple Stories” moves between an RMS Titanic survivor, Jewish refugees aboard the MS St Louis in 1939, and the biblical story of Jonah and the whale. These stories all consider what it is like to survive at sea when the odds seem stacked against one.

In “Upstream,” an actor heads to the jungle for filming. He doesn’t like the jungle because it is far removed from normal society, and it is unsafe. Knowing that the natives don’t like the film crew, the actor fears it is only a matter of time before they attack the camp. Although the natives don’t attack the film crew, one of the actor’s friends dies in a rafting accident during filming. The actor doesn’t know what to believe anymore.

Sandwiched between chapters eight and nine is the very short story “Parenthesis.” The narrator talks about love and how love gives us a reason to live. Without love, we don’t leave any lasting legacies behind. In this story, the narrator, calling himself “Julian Barnes,” directly addresses readers.

//'I love you.' For a start, we'd better put these words on a high shelf; in a square box behind glass which we have to break with our elbow; in the bank. We shouldn't leave them lying around the house like a tube of vitamin C. If the words come too easily to hand, we'll use them without thought; we won'tbe able to resist. Oh, we say we won't, but we will. We'll get drunk, or lonely, or likeliest of all - plain damn hopeful, and there are the words gone, used up, grubbied. We think we might be in love and we're trying out the words to see if they're appropriate? How can we know what we think till we hear what we say? Come off it; that won't wash. These are grand words; we must make sure we deserve them. Listen to them again: 'I love you'. Subject, verb, object: the unadorned, impregnable sentence. The subject is a short word, implying the self-effacement of the lover. The verb is longer but unambiguous, a demonstrative moment as the tongue flicks anxiously away from the palate to release the vowel. The object, like the subject, has no consonants, and is attained by pushing the lips forward as if for a kiss. 'I love you'. How serious, how weighted, how freighted it sounds.


I imagine a phonic conspiracy between the world's languages. They make a conference decision that the phrase must always sound like something to be earned, to be striven for, to be worthy of. "Ich liebe dich": a late-night, cigarette-voiced whisper, with that happy rhyme of subject and object. "Je t'aime": a different procedure, with the subject and object being got out of the way first, so that the long vowel of adoration can be savoured to the full. (The grammar is also one of reassurance: with the object positioned second, the beloved isn't suddenly going to turn out to be someone different.) "Ya byn lyublyu": the object once more in consoling second position, but this time - despite the hinting rhyme of subject and object - an implication of difficulty, obstacles to be overcome. "Ti amo": it sounds perhaps a bit too much like an apéritif, but is full of structural conviction with subject and verb, the doer and the deed, enclosed in the same word.


Forgive the amateur approach. I'll happily hand the project over to some philanthropic foundation devoted to expanding the sum of human knowledge. Let them commission a research team to examine the phrase in all the languages of the world, to see how it varies, to discover what its sounds denote to those who hear them, to find out if the measure of happiness changes according to the richness of the phrasing. A question from the floor: are there tribes whose lexicon lacks the words "I love you"? Or have they all died out?


We must keep these words in their box behind glass. And when we take them out we must be careful with them. Men will say 'I love you' to get women into bed with them; women will say 'I love you' to get men into marriage with them;

both will say 'I love you' to keep fear at bay, to convince themselves of the deed by the word, to assure themselves that the promised condition has arrived, to deceive themselves that it hasn't yet gone away. We must beware of such uses. "I love you" shouldn't go out into the world, become a currency, a traded share, make profits for us. It will do that if we let it. But keep this biddable phrase for whispering into a nape from which the absent hair has just been swept.//


“Project Ararat” follows an astronaut sent to uncover the remains of Noah’s Ark. This once-in-a-lifetime opportunity will have real consequences for the world.

“The Dream” considers what happens when it’s all over and we die. It muses on what Heaven looks like and what it can teach us about life, death, and historical preservation.

‐---‐------

By Nandakishore Sir

A History of the World in 10½  Chapters

by Julian Barnes

I can't review this book without giving an outline of the story, so  there may be mild spoilers. But I don't think it will affect your  enjoyment of the book.

History isn't what happened. History is just  what historians tell us. There was a pattern, a plan, a movement,  expansion, the march of democracy; it is a tapestry, a flow of events, a  complex narrative, connected, explicable. One good story leads to  another. First it was kings and archbishops with some offstage divine  tinkering, then it was the march of ideas and the movements of masses,  then little local events which mean something bigger, but all the time  it's connections, progress, meaning, this led to this, this happened  because of this. And we, the readers of history, the sufferers from  history, we scan the pattern for hopeful conclusions, for the way ahead.  And we cling to history as a series of salon pictures, conversation  pieces whose participants we can easily reimagine back into life, when  all the time it's more like a multi-media collage, with paint applied by  decorator's roller rather than camel-hair brush.


The history of  the world? Just voices echoing in the dark; images that burn for a few  centuries and then fade, stories, old stories that sometimes seem to  overlap; strange links, impertinent connections. We lie here in our  hospital bed of the present (what nice clean sheets we get nowadays)  with a bubble of daily news drip-fed into our arm. We think we know who  we are, though we don't quite know why we're here, or how long we shall  be forced to stay. And while we fret and writhe in bandaged uncertainty -  are we a voluntary patient? - we fabulate. We make up a story to cover  the facts we don't know or can't accept; we keep a few true facts and  spin a new story round them. Our panic and our pain are only eased by  soothing fabulation; we call it history.

This quote  is taken from the chapter titled 'Parenthesis' in the novel - it is the  'half chapter' that the novelist is referring to in the title. It sort  of encapsulates what he is trying to to do in the book.


In  school, I learnt history as a bunch of dry facts: events, dates, and  places which had to be memorised. It was utterly boring, and an absolute  nightmare to cram it all up to regurgitate on the answer sheet during  the exams. I said goodbye to it as soon as I could and embraced  mathematics and science, which were more amenable to rational analysis  (as I felt in my late teens, that is).


Then as I started reading,  I found the problem was not with history but with how it was taught.  Properly presented, history is more exciting than any work of fiction.  It's the story of humanity - our story - and it is the source of all the stories out there.


The  only problem is - it isn't true. What is true, are the dry facts which I  used to mug up during childhood. The rest is the flesh put on the  skeleton by historians: and according to their whims and fancies, they  can create a beautiful damsel or a grotesque monster.


(Hey, I  know it's not as bad as that. There are acceptable ways of interpreting  and analysing history, and historians are on the whole an honest lot, so  we do get a true picture of the past by reading the books of reputed  scholars in the field - despite disagreements. But the subject, on the  whole, has a whole lot of subjectivity in it.)


This book is  fiction. But is it a novel? Or a set of interlinked stories? Or a  potpourri of myth, history, exposition and fiction? It would be  difficult to say. The ten-and-a-half chapters mentioned in the title  have only tenuous links to one another, but reading them in series, the  connections are obvious. But it is immediately apparent that they would  existence as standalone stories too. Starting with (1) the Biblical myth  of Noah's Ark (narrated by a woodworm which has stowed aboard without  the knowledge of the patriarch), it moves through (2) the hijacking of a  ship by Palestinian terrorists (or freedom fighters, depending on which  side of the divide you are); (3) a curious case from the sixteenth  century where woodworm are tried in a French court for gnawing through  the bishop's chair, causing him to fall and suffer a head injury; (4)  the tale of a delusional woman, going to the sea with two cats to escape  a supposed nuclear holocaust; (5) the history behind Théodore  Géricault's famous nineteenth century painting, The Raft of the Medusa;  (6) the story of a passionate evangelist who makes a pilgrimage to  Mount Ararat; (7) three short vignettes, lumped together for no apparent  reason, about the Titanic, the myth of Jonah and the whale, and a  ship full of Jews sailing from Germany in 1939, whose passengers no  country wants to accept; (8 ) an epistolary story of an actor, filming  the story of Jesuit missionaries in untamed South America; (9) the tale  of an astronaut who discovers God on the moon and embarks on a mission  (again!) to Mount Ararat; (10) and a fantasy about heaven as we have  never imagined it. In between chapters eight and nine is tucked in the  parenthesis, in which Barnes talks directly to the reader about love,  life and history.


Barnes is extremely readable, and you can get  lost in his beautiful prose full of wry English humour without analysing  it. But at some point of time, the perceptive reader will realise that  there is a subtext here, which she could come to grips with if only  she'd do a bit of brainwork. There are enough metaphors for the taking.  Almost all the chapters contain sea voyages, emanating directly from the  journey which Noah is credited with taking. The mess in the Middle  East, the trials and tribulations of evangelists, and the sad plight of  Jews in Hitler's Germany - one can't help feeling that it all started  with Noah; and the woodworm, insidiously infesting and gnawing at the  very foundations of the Church, has been there even before the deluge.  Humankind's progress is always accompanied by rot from within.


To  be entirely honest, this fictitious history contains precious little of  "real" history. Barnes is just trying to put his narrative - the  narrative of a creative writer - into a frame work of history (as  defined by him in the passage quoted in the beginning.) Whatever he has  done, however, is a resounding success.


Friday, October 11, 2024

Before the Coffee gets cold ~ Toshikazu Kawaguchi (106 of 2024)

Reread this book as part of the CBC discussion for the month.  

An easy read but contemplative, leaving you in tears. 

In "Before the Coffee Gets Cold" by Toshikazu Kawaguchi, the story revolves around a small, somewhat magical café in Tokyo where patrons can travel back in time—under strict rules. The novel focuses on the relationships, emotions, and personal journeys of its characters. Here’s a list of the main characters and a brief description of each:


1. Fumiko Kiyokawa

Fumiko is a career-driven woman who regrets a decision that led to her boyfriend leaving for a job in the United States. She visits the café to travel back in time to try to change the course of their relationship. Her story is about missed opportunities and reconciling with the past.

2. Goro

Goro is Fumiko's boyfriend, who leaves Tokyo for a job opportunity in the United States. His relationship with Fumiko is central to her desire to travel back in time and try to fix what went wrong.

3. Kohtake

Kohtake is a nurse who wants to visit her husband in the past. She’s married to Fusagi, who is suffering from Alzheimer’s disease, and she seeks a way to connect with the man he was before the disease took over.

4. Fusagi

Fusagi is Kohtake's husband, a man suffering from Alzheimer’s. As his memories fade, their relationship changes, and Kohtake struggles with the loss of the man she knew. Fusagi’s condition is a heartbreaking aspect of the story.

5. Hirai

Hirai is a woman who runs a nearby snack bar and has distanced herself from her family, particularly her sister, Kumi. She harbors guilt over their estranged relationship and seeks to reconcile those feelings. Her story focuses on forgiveness and healing family bonds.

6. Kumi

Kumi is Hirai’s younger sister, who attempts to reconnect with Hirai despite their strained relationship. Kumi’s story is brief but impactful, and it pushes Hirai to confront her feelings about their past.

7. Kyoko

Kyoko is a pregnant woman who visits the café to travel to the future, seeking reassurance about how her unborn child will grow up. Her story is about maternal love and concern for the well-being of her child.

8. The Ghost Woman

This mysterious character sits in the café every day, occupying the one chair that allows time travel. She is bound by her own rules, and her presence plays an important role in the time-travel process. She is a quiet, eerie figure who adds a sense of magic to the café's atmosphere.

The novel doesn't provide a direct, detailed explanation of how the ghost woman came into existence. However, based on the narrative and hints within the story, there are some possible interpretations:


She may be a former customer of the café who once attempted time travel and, for reasons unknown, became "stuck" in the chair. This could imply that something went wrong during her time-traveling experience, and now she is trapped in some liminal state, existing between time periods. Her role as the permanent occupant of the chair suggests she has a deep connection to the chair's magical properties.


She could be a symbolic representation of the consequences of time travel. Since the book deals with themes of regret, loss, and the limits of changing the past, the ghost woman might represent someone who has been unable to move on from her own past. She could serve as a reminder to the café’s visitors about the importance of accepting the limitations of their journey through time.


The café's magic and its rules might have created her presence. The café's time-traveling ability operates under strict conditions and guidelines, and the ghost woman might be part of the magic that keeps the system functioning. Her existence could be tied to the café’s long history and the tradition of time travel, as she is always present to guard the chair.


Conclusion:

While it is generally accepted that the woman is a ghost, her precise origins and the nature of her existence are left ambiguous. This ambiguity adds to the magical and mysterious atmosphere of Funiculi Funicula. Her silent presence is a key part of the café’s aura, and while her backstory is never fully revealed, she plays an essential role in maintaining the balance and rules of the time-travel process in the café.

9. Kazu Tokita

Kazu is the waitress at the café and the key facilitator of the time-travel process. She helps patrons understand the rules and guides them through their journeys. She remains calm and composed, keeping the café’s traditions and magical elements intact.Kazu’s deep connection to the café's magical time-traveling chair that stands out. She seems to have an almost spiritual or protective relationship with the time-traveling process, ensuring that everyone respects the rules and makes the most of their brief visits to the past or future.

10. The Café Owners

There are brief mentions of the owners of the café, who have maintained the establishment's time-traveling capabilities. Their roles are more behind-the-scenes but are integral to the café's history and its mysterious powers.

Nagare Tokita

Nagare is the owner of Funiculi Funicula, a quiet and calm man with a strong, yet understated presence. He is Kazu Tokita’s uncle and takes a hands-off approach when it comes to running the café. He is aware of the café’s mysterious time-traveling abilities but leaves the handling of the time-traveling customers largely to Kazu, his niece. Nagare is a key figure in maintaining the traditions and secrets of the café.

Kei is a significant character in the story, particularly because of her own personal connection to the café's time-traveling abilities. She is a kind and cheerful woman, married to Nagare, and is expecting their child during the course of the novel. Kei has a heart condition, which makes her pregnancy risky, and she struggles with fears about her future and the health of her unborn child.


Kei’s desire to meet her future child leads her to use the café's time-traveling ability. Her story revolves around themes of maternal love, hope, and the uncertainties of life. Through her journey, the novel delves deeper into how the ability to see the future can bring comfort or closure, even in the face of difficult circumstances.


Each character in "Before the Coffee Gets Cold" has their own personal struggles, regrets, or desires that lead them to take advantage of the café’s time-traveling chair. Their interconnected stories revolve around the themes of love, loss, regret, and the importance of cherishing the present moment.


The story focuses more on the emotional journeys of the visitors rather than the origins of the café itself. However, Nagare and Kazu are the main figures overseeing the café and its operations during the timeline of the novel.



words' by Ullie Kaye Poetry


 Instead of saying, "i know what it feels like", let's say "i cannot imagine your heartbreak".

instead of saying, "you're strong, you'll get through this, let's say " you'll hurt, and I'll be here.

instead of saying, "you look like you're doing well, let's say, "how are you holding up today?"

instead of saying, "healing takes time", let's say "healing has no timeline".

instead of saying, "everything happens for a reason, let's say "this must feel so terribly senseless right now".

and when there are no words to say at all, you don't need to try and find some.  love speaks in silences too.

~ 'words' by Ullie Kaye Poetry 

~ Art by Jennifer Yoswa

Thursday, October 10, 2024

Ratan Tata




Indeed the rays of sunshine, he was for India, A jewel.

This is one of the first interviews I had heard about him:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ozetTgOHu78





Born on 28th December 1937, his life story is worth a read. Why do some loss feel so personal,  even if we have not even met the person? An industrialist who left a great legacy, leading by example for future generations!
We deeply admire Ratan Tata for his visionary leadership and unwavering commitment to integrity. His ability to lead with humility and build a global legacy while prioritizing the welfare of society is inspiring.   He set an unparalleled example in business ethics and philanthropy, teaching us that true success lies in lifting others along the way.
My friends who worked with him say "he leaves a little bit of himself within you with every breath you take in his presence",
Ratan Tata's dedication to innovation and social good continues to motivate us to aim for excellence with purpose. His legacy will forever inspire industries across India, to push boundaries and serve the community.
Salute and Gratitude to all that you have done and for being you, an inspiration. To the Jewel of India, Tata this 9th October 2024



Mr. Ratan Tata is no more. Whatever your thoughts on him, one thing can't be denied. There is no one in India whose life isn't touched by his businesses daily. From common salt to five-star hotels, from textiles to steel, from cars to aviation, the Tatas have penetrated Indian life pretty deeply. Modern Indian history is intertwined with that of the Tatas, and Ratan Tata, who took the mantle from J.R.D. Tata has taken the business empire to new heights. He withstood tough times, tough governments, and tough competition. At the tail end of his life, there were a few conspiracies and setbacks, but they never affected his general image as a benevolent leader, a lighthouse of hope. 


Today, as India mourns the loss of one of our great leaders, its important to keep in mind the lessons the great man taught us in his own amicable style - that we can lead with grace and empathy. 

Ratan Tata ji, thank you for inspiring billions of Indians. Your influence on our nation will resonate for generations to come.




 


Ratan Tata ...

In His Own Words !


“I had a happy childhood, but as my brother & I got older, we faced ragging because of our parent’s divorce, which in those days wasn’t as common. My grandmom brought us up. 


"Soon after, when my mother remarried, the boys at school started saying all kinds of things about us. But our grandmother taught us to retain dignity at all costs, a value that’s always stayed with me. It involved walking away from these situations instead of fighting back.


"And if it weren’t for grandmom, I wouldn’t be half the person I am today. 


"My father and I couldn’t agree on the same thing – I wanted to go to college in the US, he insisted on UK. I wanted to be an architect, he insisted on me becoming an engineer. If it weren’t for my grandmother, I wouldn’t have ended up at Cornell University in the US. It was because of her that even though I enrolled for mechanical engineering, I switched majors & graduated with a degree in architecture. My father was upset, but I was finally my own, independent person in college & it was my grandmother who taught me that courage to speak up can also be soft.


"After college, I landed a job at an architecture firm in LA, where I worked for 2 years. It was a great time – the weather was beautiful & I loved my job. It was in LA that I fell in love & almost got married. But at the same time I’d made the decision to move back, at least temporarily, since grandmom wasn’t keeping too well. So I came back to visit her & thought that the person I wanted to marry would come to India with me, but because of the 1962 Indo-China war her parent’s weren’t okay with her making the move anymore & the relationship fell apart.



"After the move, I did spend some time with my grandmom. I’d run with my dog, catch up with her & we’d have long chats. I’m glad I got that time with her before she passed, because right after I moved to Jamshedpur for an internship at what’s known as Tata Motors now. 

It was a waste of time – I was moved from one department to another & since I was a family member, no one told me what to do – I spent 6 months trying to be ‘useful’. 


"It was only after I moved to Tata Steel that I got specific work & my job got interesting. I started from the floor & understood the plight of those working there. So years later, when we downsized Tata Steel from 78,000 to 40,000, we ensured to pay them their present day wages until retirement–it’s been in our DNA to serve those who serve us. 


"Then, in 1991, JRD stepped down as the Chairman of Tata Industries and then from Tata Sons, there was vicious criticism. 

There were other aspirants, who were vocal of him having made the wrong decision. I had been through this before, so I did what I knew best–maintained silence & focused on proving myself. 

The criticism was personal–JRD got clubbed with nepotism & I, as the wrong choice. I was under scrutiny, but the time I spent on the floor served as a big plus – I hadn’t gotten there from nowhere!


"All in all, it was a big move. I remember after I was appointed Chairman, I walked with JRD to his office, where he told his secretary that he had to move out. I said, ‘No, J, don’t move out, this is your office for as long as you want.’ He said, ‘Where will you sit?’ I said, ‘Where I’m sitting today–I have an office down the hall & that’s fine.’


"I was lucky to have him there. He was my greatest mentor & the years that he was alive, I used to go into his office & say, ‘J, I wish this had happened 10 years ago, we have such a great relationship.’ He was like a father & a brother to me & not enough’s been said about that.


"Ever since, my life has been for & about growing the company. When I was appointed Chairman, it was believed my surname got me the position, but my focus was on creating something bigger than us all & on giving back, which has been in the TATA DNA since the start. 

With Jamshedpur for instance, while our workers were thriving, the surrounding villages were suffering. It became our goal to uplift their quality of life as well … things like these came naturally to us. 


"Even with the Nano – I remember seeing a family of 4 on a bike in the heavy Bombay rain—I wanted to do more for these families who were risking their lives for lack of an alternative. By the time we launched the Nano, our costs were higher, but I’d made a promise & we delivered. Looking back, I’m proud of the car & the decision to go ahead with it. 


"That’s what my life has been about—work became a lifestyle. I was always at Bombay House or travelling, that’s why even though I came close to marriage with 2-3 different partners, I couldn’t go through with it because they’d have to adjust to my lifestyle & that didn’t sit right with me. 


"Now that I’m retired, that lifestyle has changed again. People ask if I’m truly ‘retired’ & to that I say—there’s no doubt about it. I’m enjoying the separation from the company—I don’t look at newspapers & worry about the bad stuff anymore.


"But let me tell you, retirement isn't about playing golf, or reading on a beach, whilst sipping on a cocktail. In fact, never before has the urge to do more, been greater. From affordable cancer treatment, to making the lives in rural India easier—I’m looking forward to making it happen at the Tata Trust. I’m trying to enjoy myself to be honest— I’m spending time with friends —old & new, across age groups, who I’m constantly learning from. 


"At 82, I’m still learning, so when you ask me to give advice, I feel like the ‘right advice’ changes over a period of time—but the one thing that remains unchanged is the desire to do the right thing. 


"So I’ll say this —leave the advice & do the right thing, even if it isn’t the easiest thing to do. When you look back at your life, that’s what’s going to matter the most. Doing the right thing.” 

Ratan Tata led the 156-year-old Tata group for just about 20 years. But the changes that he brought in in those two decades were vital in keeping the group’s reputation as India’s foremost industrial house.Ratan Tata took the reins of the group from his illustrious predecessor, J.R.D. Tata at a time India had just opened its doors to global companies. Tata group’s annual turnover was just about 4 billion US dollars when he took over in 1991. It was 100 billion dollars when he retired in 2012. And he has a left a legacy that cannot be measured by counting zeroes.

JRD Tata handed over the reins of Tata Group to Ratan Tata in March 1991.

Speaking of the board meeting in which the announcement was made that Ratan Tata would be the new chairman, the businessman recalled that JRD Tata revisited all the years he had put in into the business. “I have heard many of my colleagues say that there was history that day because apart from the fact that he was stepping down from a position that he had held for 40 to 50 years, there was a lot of emotion attached to his giving up this position in favour of someone. But the history and emotion that everyone talks about is not that move. He reminisced through years at that meeting and I can’t reproduce it emotionally or otherwise but that meeting went on like an archival recount of all his days in Tata. Never his own praise but his experiences as he went through. There was history that day, we all came out very moved," he said.


Unveiled in 1998 at the Auto Expo in Pragati Maidan, Tata’s first foray into passenger vehicles was game-changing. And behind it was the vision of one man: Ratan Tata.


Ratan’s predecessor, JRD Tata, had dreamt of launching a fully indigenous family car. But the government’s policies at the time did not allow him to proceed. The idea of Indica came up only after 1991 — when JRD stepped down and named Ratan as Tata Sons chairman, and India’s economy underwent structural reforms.


About 15 years ago, Ratan Tata promised something that would shake up the Indian vehicle market – Tata Nano, a car that would cost just Rs 1 lakh and fulfil the middle-class dream of owning a four-wheeler. It became commonly known as the Lakhtakia car, the Hindi equivalent of a Rs 1 lakh car. This was they say, after he saw a family of four riding on a motor bike in Mumbai. 


The proposal, though, faced significant roadblocks. His proposed car factory at Singur in Bengal – this was when Buddhadeb Bhattacharya as the CPI(M)’s Bengal Chief Minister was trying to attract investment to the state and change the direction of his party – got caught in a land acquisition row, as Mamata Banerjee, keen to replace the CPI(M), launched a movement against the plan.


Tata did not wait long for the Singur crisis to resolve. Deft at doing business with politicians while maintaining enough of a distance, he bagged a deal from Narendra Modi, the then CM of Gujarat who was trying to build an industry-friendly image, to set up the car factory at Sanand in Gujarat instead.



Ratan Tata, the former Tata Group chairperson who headed the empire famously known for its salt to software imprint on Indian lives, made just one foray into the entertainment industry. And it didn't work.

"Aetbaar", co-produced by Tata Infomedia and Cutting Edge Entertainment Productions, tanked at the box office. Inspired by the 1996 Hollywood movie "Fear", the psychological thriller starred Amitabh Bachchan, John Abraham and Bipasha Basu and was directed by Vikram Bhatt.


With name and fame and responsibilities obviously there would be differences in opinions and controversy too. Some well known ones are:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/indianexpress.com/article/business/ratan-tata-singur-mistry-tata-tapes-wadia-controversies-9613283/lite/https://www.google.com/amp/s/indianexpress.com/article/business/ratan-tata-singur-mistry-tata-tapes-wadia-controversies-9613283/lite/




Official announcement was made, but it was not a holiday for the company. That is how he would have liked it to be. But yes, over 300 community Durga Puja committees in Jamshedpur refrained from playing music and cancelled cultural programmes on Thursday as a mark of respect to Chairman Emeritus of Tata Sons Ratan Naval Tata, who died in a Mumbai hospital a day ago. A senior functionary of the Central Durga Puja Committee of the city said some of the organisers have also put up Tata's photograph beside the marquees.

"We have appealed to all the community puja committees to observe the festival in a simple manner and urged them not to play any music, barring mandatory instruments like 'dhak' (drum) etc, to pay respect to Ratan Tata," General Secretary of the Central Puja Committee, Ashutosh Kumar Singh, told PTI.

There are many thoughts and lessons from him, here are a few:


The Family Tree:


Jamsetji Tata, the founder of the Tata Group was born to Nusserwanji Ratan Tata and Jeevanbai Kavasji Tata, in 1939. apart from Jamsetji, Nusserwanji had four other children — Ratanbai, Maneckbai, Virbaiji, Jerbai.


Born into a family of Parsi priests, Jamsetji broke the tradition as he started his own trading firm in 1868 at a young age of 29. He started with a textile mill in central India in the 1870s. His vision later set the foundation for technical education in India and helped the nation to be counted among the industrialised nations.


Jamsetji married Hirabai Daboo and had three children — Sir Dorabji Tata, Dhunbai Tata and Sir Ratan Tata. 


Dorabji, the elder son of Jamsetji, was instrumental in translating his father’s vision into reality. It was under his leadership that the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust was created, propelling the Tata tradition of philanthropy. Jamsetji’s younger son, Ratan, was a philanthropist who created a trust to fund educational development, alleviate human sufferings and other public utility works.


Sir Ratan Tata married Navjbai Sett and adopted Naval H Tata. Naval married Sonoo Commisariat and had two sons — Ratan N Tata and Jimmy N Tata. But Naval and Soonoo divorced when Ratan N Tata was only 10 years old. Naval later married Simone Dunoyer and with her, had a son, Noel Tata. Noel is Ratan and Jimmy’s half brother.While Ratan and Jimmy never married, Noel tied knot with Aloo Mistry, sister of late Cyrus Mistry, who served as Chairman of Tata Group. Noel and Aloo have three children — Leah Tata, Maya Tata and Neville Tata.


Neville is married to Manasi Kirloskar and together they have two children – Jamset Tata and Tiana Tata.


Again, Jeevanbai Kavasji Tata’s brother Dadabhai Kavasji Tata (adopted son of Kavasji Maneckji Tata) had a son with his wife Bhikhibai. Dadabhai’s son Ratanji Dadabhai Tata married a French woman Suzanne Briere. They had five children — Syla Petit, Jehangir Ratanji Dababhai Tata, Rodabeh Tata, Darab Tata and Jimmy Tata. 



Many of us felt lost at the demise of the great humanitarian, Mr Ratan Tata.

But to no surprise, he has given life lessons.


A human is remembered for his deeds and his impact on other’s lives.


As many have mentioned, Ratan Tata has been known for his philanthropy and kindness to fur babies. Yes, he is a giver; employer for many, lover of animals, and owner of many lives

Let us respect our legend, by giving out what we can.


Let us give smiles to those who are in need;

Let us give shoulders to those who are desperate;

Let us give ears to those who want to talk;

Let us give love, to those who are around;

 

Let us feed a bird which flew miles;

Let us pat a dog which looks out for one;

Let us water the plants, which are deserted;

Let us give back to nature, which offers us life.

 

#gratitude #mentalhealth


Never underestimate the power of kindness, empathy, and compassion in your interactions with others. 

—Ratan Tata



A note on his grandmother, can we call her the driver of his destiny?

Ratan Tata’s grandmother Navajbai Tata was a philanthropist, first woman director of Tata Sons

Brand Custodian of Tata Sons.


Ratan Tata’s paternal grandmother, whose birth anniversary was marked last week, on September 23, was a woman who stood tall. She was the first woman director of Tata Sons – a position she assumed in 1925 – and was known to be a generous philanthropist. The group paid its tribute to Lady Navajbai Tata last week.


“She was the first woman Director of Tata Sons, the holding company of the Tata group. Appointed a Director in 1925, she held the position right until her demise in 1965,” 


Lady Navajbai Tata was married to Sir Ratan Tata, who was the younger son of Jamsetji Tata. She was widowed in 1918, at the age of 41 years but managed the vast estate after that.


Navajbai was also known for her generosity. When a social worker requested her to establish a convalescent home, she donated her manor in Matheran, ‘Homestead’, for the cause, along with a donation of Rs 3 lakh. The amount was significantly large for that time.


She established the Sir Ratan Tata Institute (RTI) in Mumbai in 1928. The objective was to provide employment to the poor and needy women and training them and offering them livelihoods. “Needy women were trained in cookery, hand embroidery, tailoring and laundry divisions,” 

 ‘We don’t sell broken businesses; we fix them.’ - Ratan Tata. 


A snippet from yearbook, Riverdale Country School,1955.

A dog lover, during the last decade, as he was going through lot of turmoil internally, with the Cyrus Mistry  battle he was instrumental in supporting an young boy whom he addressed as a friend,  an younger brother.  

The legal battle moved to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and finally, came to the apex court. The top court, on March 26, 2021, upheld Mistry's removal as the executive chairman of the Tata Group and brought the curtains down on the bitter public and legal battle.

In 2022 Mistry passed away in a tragic road accident,  soon after his father's death. He was the BIL of his half brother who is now the Chairman of the group.


Once, in a telephone interview, a radio host asked Ratan Tata, "What has been the happiest moment in your life?" He replied:


"I have gone through four different stages of happiness in life, and in the end, I realized what true happiness is.


The first stage was when I earned a lot of money and wealth. But I didn’t find the happiness I desired there. Then came the second stage. At that point, I began collecting valuable things. I soon realized that this happiness too was only temporary. After that, I moved into the third stage. Here, I started several new projects. Soon, I was in charge of distributing 95% of oil in India and Africa. I also became the owner of the largest steel factory in India and Asia. But still, I couldn’t find the happiness I dreamed of.


Finally, the fourth stage arrived. It was like this: Once, a friend of mine told me that we should buy and donate wheelchairs for 200 disabled children. I did so immediately. He then insisted that I personally attend the event to distribute them. I agreed. I personally handed over the wheelchairs to all 200 children. As they accepted them, I saw a certain wild light of joy on their faces. It was as if they had all just arrived at a scenic picnic spot. That day, I understood what true happiness was.


As I was about to leave, one child clung tightly to my legs. No matter how hard I tried, I couldn’t move. Finally, I asked him, 'Do you want something else?' Looking directly at my face, the child said, 'I want to remember your face well, so that tomorrow, when we meet in heaven, I can thank you again.'


So, dear friends, we must realize that true happiness doesn’t lie in money, power, or fame. It lies in embracing others and including them in our lives."


Tribute — Ratan Naval Tata 🙏🏼🌹